Last year, I wrote on the this blog why I don't watch the Grammys. But I pay attention to the Facebook, Twitter, & Tumblr, & people are talking about Grammys (which aired last night) today.
Most of the people who are talking about the Grammys are people who don't know or don't care that there's an amazing world of music out there that isn't played on top 40 radio, or on any commercial radio at all. Those same people listen mostly (I would assume) to either whatever's on the radio now or music that meant a lot to them (which was probably also on the radio then) when they were of the age (teens to early twenties) when music seemed to mean a lot. & when I say, "whatever's on the radio," I tend to mean, whatever's on whatever popular service people listen to, because I simply don't know.
In short, they don't listen to the sort of radio I make, or to the music one hears on the sorts of radio stations I've been on (college/community). I have in fact been told by people (my family, acquaintances who listen to my show when they've found out I do one) that my music is "weird." Whatever is accepted as mainstream is "not weird" to them.
I have no problem with that. I make the assumption that, in general, that they are more passive listeners of music than I am. They are happy to accept whatever music is placed in front of them by corporations. They're concerned with many other things than just the music they hear (mostly csex appeal & things the artists wear & say). They aren't aware that so much of that music is, in effect, written by committee, & designed to be catchy so it sticks in your head. (I liken it to music for commercials, which in a way it really is.) (Perhaps you should listen to what Bo Burnham thinks of popular music.)
I started thinking that it's interesting that a "popular" form of art is composed of a such a narrow band of people. The sort of musical act that makes its way to the Grammys, compared to the number of musicians out there, may make the Grammy crowd the musical 1%.
My point is that I get it. I understand that people who have a limited knowledge of, or desire to discover, the vast amount of amazing music out there, some of which will stand the test of time in ways virtually all of this year's Grammy winners & nominees won't, I understand that they listen to & like the most convenient music that exists for them.
What I don't understand is the people I know from my radio stations who obsess & reblog & defend Grammy nominees + winners. They know much more about the 99% of the music out there that the Grammys will never acknowledge, let alone celebrate. & I have to ask, truly: don't they listen to their own radio stations?
No comments:
Post a Comment